↓ Skip to main content
Rillsoft AI
Connect Rillsoft

Rillsoft AI

AI examples in Rillsoft Project

Four reproduced cases with synthetic data: resource bottleneck, staff across sites, baseline comparison, role usage as a chart.

Every example shows a concrete planning question, the data used, the steps in Rillsoft Project with a screenshot, the result and the tools behind it. The calculations happen in Rillsoft Project; the AI sets the view, reads the result and prepares it – in the fourth example as a chart.

“Find a resource bottleneck” and “Compare the plan with its baseline” run against industry packages shipped with the setup. “Staff across sites” uses a Rillsoft GmbH rail construction test project, “Role usage as a chart” a steel and facade construction test portfolio. People, companies and projects are synthetic. The two industry-package examples are validated against Rillsoft Project 10 Build 10.0.623; the rail construction example is derived from the test project, and the steel construction example is validated against build 10.0.625.

Which example answers your question?
#

Is a skill short in the portfolio – where, how many hours, in which projects? Then find a resource bottleneck. Is the local team not enough although the group has people? Then staff across sites. Has the plan slipped against its baseline – in dates, effort or cost? Then compare the plan with its baseline. How is the work spread across the roles over time – as a picture for management? Then role usage as a chart.

Four worked-through examples

Rillsoft Project, human resource capacity planning of the Machinery and plant engineering portfolio by role, December 2026 to February 2027, effort in hours: shortfall −344 (22 %) for Electrical design engineer, −328 (32 %) for Technical buyer, −192 (5 %) for Assembly fitter and −184 (13 %) for Mechatronics technician Find a resource bottleneck Two capacity views: electrical design is short by 344 hours, purchasing by 328; the mechatronics peak on 21–23 December comes from P-80 and R-12. Rillsoft Project, human resource capacity planning of the track and turnout renewal at Rheinstadt station: construction phase 1 – track 1 closure with a shortfall of −224 (37 %) in red, below it the resource chart of the track workers with orange shortage bars above the green capacity line The right resource despite a site bottleneck Is the branch crew enough for the track possession? Rail example: shortfall per role with and without the preferred team – the bottleneck is the site. Rillsoft Project, variance analysis time of ERP module financial accounting: columns start, difference, finish, difference – system test +7 and +8 days, Acceptance granted +9, Go-live completed +27, Project closed +28; planned and actual bars stacked, cutoff date 19.02.2027 Compare the plan status with the baseline Baseline, status date, actual data, three comparison views: on the ERP module acceptance slips by nine days and go-live by four weeks – effort and cost stay. Stacked column chart “Role usage per day – December 2026” of the steel and facade construction portfolio: 31 days, ten coloured role segments per column, totals between 120 and 152 hours above the columns, weekends and the days from 25 December without a column; footer 2,280 h in total, highest daily usage 152 h on 18 and 21 December, 17 of 31 days with usage Role usage as a stacked chart How is December's work spread across the roles? Rillsoft Project supplies the hours per day, the AI draws the stacked chart. Machine capacity planning, day scale 9 Nov to 19 Dec 2026: row battery assembly with shortfall −21.7 (18%); 10, 11, 12, 17 and 18 Nov highlighted with demand 11.9, 18, 15.8, 11.9 and 9.3 hours against supply 9; resource chart with bars up to 2 Check SAP production order capacity with AI 48 SAP operations in Rillsoft: reproduce machine demand, shifts and a 21.7-hour assembly capacity shortfall. Human resource capacity planning, hourly scale 13 Nov 2026: row 21.001 Mechanics RES-0100 expanded with ten technicians, effort 68.25, shortfall −31.92 (47%); hours 10 to 12 highlighted with demand 11.9, 32.5 and 8.7 persons against 10; resource chart peaking at 48 Check SAP maintenance workforce capacity with AI 117 SAP maintenance operations: examine role demand and a 24.3-hour staff shortfall hidden by daily totals.